O Que é um Texto? (Parte 2)
DOI:
10.29286/rep.v18i36.519Palavras-chave:
Semiótica do texto. Ensino matemático. Teoria da complementaridade.Resumo
O que é um texto? À primeira vista, esta pergunta pode parecer curiosa para alguns. Afinal de contas, aqui nós nos preocupamos com livros didáticos de Matemática e isso deixa parecer que uma pessoa sabe o que é um texto matemático em um livro didático. Mas, mesmo sendo o mais importante “instrumento” do ensino na matemática, como nas outras disciplinas, o livro parece um desconhecido. Poucos livros didáticos são configurados de acordo com normas científicas. Os maiores problemas resultam do fato que quase ninguém percebe que precisamos de tipos diferentes de textos para tarefas variadas e que mesmo assim o texto não pode nem substituir o dialogo vivo, nem ser excluído ou ignorado do ensino, pois os alunos precisam tanto da comunicação viva como da oportunidade de refletir individualmente sobre o conhecimento.
What is a Text? (Part 2)
Abstract
What is a text? At first glance, this question may seem curious to some. After all, we are concerned with mathematics textbooks for school here, and it would seem that one knows what a text in a mathematical textbook is. But even though textbooks remain to be the most important “instruments” of teaching few of them seem designed by scientific insights or standards. The greatest problems result from the ignorance that different types of goals require different types of texts. Texts could neither substitute personal communication nor could they be excluded from classrooms. The students need as much the living example of knowledge, as they must have opportunity of constructive rumination on their own, individually.
Keywords: Text semiotics. Mathematical education. The concept of complementarity
Downloads
Referências
AEBLI, H. Denken: dat Ordnen des Tuns. Stuttgart. , Klett-Cotta, 1981.
ATHEN, H. et al. Mathematik heute 7. Hanover: Schroedel, 1979.
ATIYAH, M. ‚Wandel und Fortschritt. In: der Mathematik‘ in M. Otte (Ed.): Mathematiker über die Mathematik. Berlin: Springer, 1974.
BALLSTAEDT, St-P. H. MANDL. W. SCHNOTZ, and S. TERGAN. Texte verstehen, Texte gestalten. München: Urban and Gauthier-Villars, 1967.
BOHM, D. Science As Perception-Communication‘. In: SUPPE, F. (Ed.): The Structure of Scientific Theories. Chicago/London: Urbana, 1977.
BRANNIGAN, A. The Social Basis of Scientific Discoveries. Cambridge: University Press, 1981.
CASTELNUOVO, E. La Matematica. Florenz: La Nuova Italia Editrice, 1979 v. 1-2.
CASTONGUAY, C. Meaning and Existence in Mathematics. Springer: Verlag, 1973.
CHOMSKY, N. Reflections on Language. London, 1975.
CHURCHMAN, C.W. Philosophie des Managements. Freiburg, 1973.
CHRZAN-FELUCH, B. and W. ZAWADOWSKI. Matemanyka 4. Wydawnictwa Szkolne: Pedagogiczne, Warsaw, 1979.
DALEK, K.; ZAWADOWSKI, W. Matematyka 5. Warsaw, 1982.
DAMEROW, P. and LEFEV’RE, W. (Eds.). Rechenstein, Experiment, Sprache. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1981.
ERSHOW, E.P. and KNUTH, D., (Eds.). Algorithms in Modern Mathematics and Computer Science. Heidelberg: Springer, 1981.
FEYNMANN, R. The Character of Physical Laws. Cambridge/USA: The MIT Press, 1967.
FISH, S. (1980), Is There a Text in This Class? Cambridge, U.S.A., 1978.
FREEDMAN, D. et al. Statistics. Norton, New York.
FREUDENTHAL, H. Weeding and Sowing. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1978.
GOMBRICH, E.H. ‘The Visual Image’. In: 73rd Yearbook of NSSE, Chicago, 1974, p. 241-270.
GREENE, D.H. and KNUTH, D. Mathematics for the Analysis of Algorithms., Basel: Birkhäuser, 1981.
HADAMARD, J. The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. New York: Dover Publication, 1954.
HAHN, O.; DZEWAS, J. Mathematik. Braunschweig: Westermann Verlag, 1978-1982.
HAYEN, J. et al. Gamma 8. Stuttgart: Klett, 1979.
HILBERT, D. Über das Unendliche‘. In: Hilbertiana, Wiss. Buchgem. Darmstadt. 1965.
HIRSCH, E.D. Validity in Interpretation. Yale University Press, 1967.
HUND, F. Grundbegriffe der Physik. Mannheim: Teil I, 1979.
JAHNKE, H.N. ‚Zum Verhältnis von Wissensentwicklung und Begründung in der Mathematik - Beweisen als didaktisches Problem‘, Materialien und Studien, v.10, Institut für Didaktik der Mathematik der Universität Bielefeld, 1978.
JAHNKE, H.N. ‚Zum Verhätnis von Bildung und wissenschaftlichem Denken am Beispiel der Mathematik‘, In: Materialen und Studien, v. 27, Institut für Didaktik
der Mathematik der Universität Bielefeld, 1982.
JAHNKE, H. N. and OTTE, M. ‚Complementarity of Theoretical Terms - Ratio and Proportion as an Example‘. Proceedings einer SLO-Konferens zum Funktionsbegriff, Enschede, 1981.
KEITEL, Ch., OTTE, M. and SEEGER, F. Text-Wissen-Tätigkeit: Das Schulbuch im Mathematikunterricht,
, Königstein/Ts, 1980.
KLIX, F. Erwachendes Denken. Berlin (DDR), 1980.
KNUTH, D. ‚Algorithms in Modern Mathematics‘. In: Ershov and Knuth, 1981. p. 82-99.
LEROI-GOURHAN, A. Le Geste et la Parole. Paris: Albin Michel, 1964.
LOTMAN, J.M. Die Struktur des künstlerischen Textes. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1973.
LURIA, A.R. The Mind of a Mnemonisi. Penguin Books, 1973.
MACH, E. (1974). The Science of Mechanics: A Critical and Historical Account of Its Development. Transl. by T. McCormack, The Open Court Publ. Comp., Lasalle (III).
MANIN, YJ. Mathematics and Physics. Basel: Birkäuser, 1981.
Mathematik 6. Berlin: Verlag Volk und Wissen, 1976.
MELLIN-OLSEN, S. ‚Instrumentalism as an Educational Concept‘, Educational Studies in Mathematics 12, p. 351-367, 1981.
MUELLER, I. ‘Euclid’s Elements and the Axiomatic Method’. In: Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 20, p. 289-309. 1969.
NEISSER, U. Cognition and Reality., San Francisco: Freeman and Co., 1976.
OTTE, M. ‘On the Question of the Development of Theoretical Concepts’, in Communication and Cognition 13, n. 1, Brugge, 1980.
______ . ‘Das Schulbuch in Mathematikunterricht’. Der Mathematiklehrer 3, p. 22-27. Hannover, 1981a.
______ . (198lb), What Relevance Has the ‘Problem of Texts’ for Mathematics Education and Its Understanding?, Occ. paper 15(1981), IDM Bielefeld.
______ . ‘Ways of Knowing and Modes of Presentation’. In: Moyens et medias dans 1‘Enseignement des Mathematiques. XXXIVe Rencontre. p. 41-69. Orleans, 1982.
______ . ‘Textual Strategies’. For The Learning of Mathematics, 3 (3), p. 15-28. Montreal, 1983.
PATTEE, H. H. ‘Discrete and Continuous Processes in Computers and Brains’, in Conrad. Güttinger and Dallin (Eds.): Physics and Mathematics of the Nervous System. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, p.128-148. Heidelberg: Springer, 1979.
POINCARÉ, H. (1948), ‘Mathematical Creation’. Scientific American. August 1948.
POLYA, G. Schule des Denkens. München: Francke Verlag, 1967.
PUTNAM, H. ‘Mathematics Without Foundations’. In: Mathematics, Matter and Method, Cambridge, 1975.
QUINE, W.V. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. Columbia University Press, 1969.
SCHMITT, H. and Wohlfarth, P. Mathematikbuch 7, BSV München, 1980.
SCHULZ v. THUN, F. and GÖTZ, W. Mathemalik verständlich erklären, München, 1976.
SKEMP, R.R. The Psychology of Learning Mathematics, Penguin Books, 1971.
SORGER, F., FREUND, H.and RÖHRL E. Trεffpunkt Mathematik 5, Herder, Freiburg, 1980.
THOM, R. ‚Modern Mathematics: Does It Exist?‘ In: A.G. Howson (Ed.), Developments in Mathem. Education. Cambridge University Press, 1973, p. 194-212.
______ . (1975), Structural Stability and Morphogenesis, Benjamin, London. TILLICH, E. and CHR. WEIΒ (Eds.). Beiträge zur Erziehungskunst, Leipzig: H. Gräff, 1806.
WANG, W.S.-Y. Human Communication: Language and its Psychological Basis, W.H. Freeman, 1981.
WOLTERS, M. Van Rekening naar Algebra. Diss. Universität Utrecht. 1978.
WALTHER, G. Textauseinandersetzung - ein Aspekt des autonomen Lernens im Mathematik-unterricht, Dortmund (unpublished typescript), 1978.
Recebimento em: 25/03/2008.
Aceite em: 01/07/2008.
English
Español (España)
Português (Brasil)
