INTENTION TO ADOPT CLIMATE-RESILIENT AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES AMONG WHEAT FARMERS IN PUNJAB, PAKISTAN: AN EXTENDED THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOUR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31413/nat.v14i4.21612Palabras clave:
agroecosystem, extension, application technologyResumen
This study aimed to investigate the psychosocial determinants of wheat growers' intention to adopt a specific set of climate-resilient agricultural practices (CRAPs) in the Punjab Province of Pakistan, which is an extended Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) including attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, trust in CRAPs performance, and current climate-resilient practice management (past behaviour). In May–July 2024, a cross-sectional survey of 384 wheat growers was carried out involving a six-stage design, purposively sampled agro-ecological zones, districts, tehsils, and randomly sampled union councils, villages, and growers. The five CRAPs were conservation tillage, certified heat- and drought-tolerant varieties, timely sowing, stage-based balanced fertilisation and critical-stage irrigation. Partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) was used for data analysis with 10,000 subsamples generated by bootstrapping. Attitude was the strongest positive predictor of intention (β = 0.446; 95% CI 0.319–0.543; p < 0.001), followed by trust in CRAPs performance (β = 0.344; p < 0.001) and perceived behavioural control (β = 0.172; p = 0.001). Subjective norms were not significant (β = 0.038; p = 0.455). Despite a positive bivariate correlation with intention, current CRAP management had a negative partial coefficient (β = −0.246; p < 0.001). This is a pattern of statistical suppression or a “ceiling effect,” not a pattern of resistance to change. The model explained 48.6% of the variance in intention (adjusted R² = 0.479; Q²predict = 0.389). The cross-sectional and intention-based nature of the design means that the results refer to intention and not actual adoption. They propose that extension programmes can reinforce intention by showing growers the agronomic success of CRAPs and help them develop the capacity to adopt them.
Keywords: Triticum aestivum L.; climate change adaptation; reasoned action approach; PLS-SEM; agricultural extension; smallholder farmers.
Referencias
ABID, M.; SCHEFFRAN, J.; SCHNEIDER, U. A.; ASHFAQ, M. Farmers' perceptions of and adaptation strategies to climate change and their determinants: the case of Punjab province, Pakistan. Earth System Dynamics, v. 6, n. 1, p. 225-243, 2015. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-225-2015
AHMAD, A.; ASLAM, Z.; JAVED, T.; HUSSAIN, S.; RAZA, A.; SHABBIR, R.; MORA-POBLETE, F.; SAEED, T.; ZULFIQAR, F.; ALI, M. M.; NAWAZ, M.; RAFIQ, M.; OSMAN, H. S.; ALBAQAMI, M.; AHMED, M. A. A.; TAUSEEF, M. Screening of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes for drought tolerance through agronomic and physiological response. Agronomy, v. 12, n. 2, e287, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020287
AJZEN, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, v. 50, n. 2, p. 179-211, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
AJZEN, I. Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, v. 32, n. 4, p. 665-683, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x
AJZEN, I. The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health, v. 26, n. 9, p. 1113-1127, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.613995
ALI, A.; ERENSTEIN, O. Assessing farmer use of climate change adaptation practices and impacts on food security and poverty in Pakistan. Climate Risk Management, v. 16, p. 183-194, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2016.12.001
ARMITAGE, C. J.; CONNER, M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, v. 40, n. 4, p. 471-499, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939
ATTA-AIDOO, J.; ANTWI-AGYEI, P.; DOUGILL, A. J.; OGBANJE, C. E.; AKOTO-DANSO, E. K.; EZE, S. Adoption of climate-smart agricultural practices by smallholder farmers in rural Ghana: an application of the theory of planned behavior. PLOS Climate, v. 1, n. 10, e0000082, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000082
BEEDELL, J.; REHMAN, T. Using social-psychology models to understand farmers' conservation behaviour. Journal of Rural Studies, v. 16, n. 1, p. 117-127, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00043-1
BORGES, J. A. R.; LANSINK, A. G. J. M. O.; RIBEIRO, C. M.; LUTKE, V. Understanding farmers' intention to adopt improved natural grassland using the theory of planned behavior. Livestock Science, v. 169, p. 163-174, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.09.014
CAMERON, A. C.; MILLER, D. L. A practitioner's guide to cluster-robust inference. Journal of Human Resources, v. 50, n. 2, p. 317-372, 2015. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.317
CONNER, M.; ARMITAGE, C. J. Extending the theory of planned behavior: a review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, v. 28, n. 15, p. 1429-1464, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x
DIAMANTOPOULOS, A.; WINKLHOFER, H. M. Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development. Journal
of Marketing Research, v. 38, n. 2, p. 269-277, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.2.269.18845
FAHAD, S.; WANG, J. Farmers' risk perception, vulnerability, and adaptation to climate change in rural Pakistan. Land Use Policy, v. 79, p. 301-309, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.018
FAO. Climate-smart agriculture case studies 2021: projects from around the world. Rome: FAO, 2021. 98p.
FAROOQ, U.; SHARIF, M.; ERENSTEIN, O. Adoption and impacts of zero-tillage in the rice-wheat zone of irrigated Punjab, Pakistan. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT; Rice-Wheat Consortium for the Indo-Gangetic Plains, 2007. 69p. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10883/1060
FAUL, F.; ERDFELDER, E.; BUCHNER, A.; LANG, A.-G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, v. 41, n. 4, p. 1149-1160, 2009. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
FISHBEIN, M.; AJZEN, I. Predicting and changing behavior: the reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press, 2010. 538p.
FORNELL, C.; LARCKER, D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, v. 18, n. 1, p. 39-50, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
GOP_Government of Pakistan. Wheat policy analysis for 2022-23 crop. Islamabad: Agriculture Policy Institute, Ministry of National Food Security and Research, 2023. 275p. Available online: https://mnfsr.gov.pk/SiteImage/Misc/files/Year%20Book%202022-23.pdf
GOP_Government of Pakistan. Pakistan Economic Survey 2023-24. Islamabad: Finance Division, 2024. 500p. Available online: https://www.finance.gov.pk/survey/chapter_24/Economic_Survey_2023_24.pdf
HAIR, J. F.; HULT, G. T. M.; RINGLE, C. M.; SARSTEDT, M. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). 3. ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2022. 384p.
HAIR, J. F.; RISHER, J. J.; SARSTEDT, M.; RINGLE, C. M. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, v. 31, n. 1, p. 2-24, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
HENSELER, J.; RINGLE, C. M.; SARSTEDT, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, v. 43, n. 1, p. 115-135, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
IPCC_Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate change 2022: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 3069p. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844
JARVIS, C. B.; MACKENZIE, S. B.; PODSAKOFF, P. M. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, v. 30, n. 2, p. 199-218, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1086/376806
KOCK, N. Common method bias in PLS-SEM: a full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, v. 11, n. 4, p. 1-10, 2015. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
KOCK, N.; HADAYA, P. Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: the inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, v. 28, n. 1, p. 227-261, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131
KREJCIE, R. V.; MORGAN, D. W. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, v. 30, n. 3, p. 607-610, 1970. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
LALANI, B.; DORWARD, P.; HOLLLOWAY, G.; WAUTERS, E. Smallholder farmers' motivations for using conservation agriculture and the roles of yield, labour and soil fertility in decision making. Agricultural Systems, v. 146, p. 80-90, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.04.002
LIPPER, L.; THORNTON, P.; CAMPBELL, B. M.; BAEDEKER, T.; BRAIMOH, A.; BWALYA, M.; CARON, P.; CATTANEO, A.; GARRITY, D.; HENRY, K.; et al. Climate-smart agriculture for food security. Nature Climate Change, v. 4, n. 12, p. 1068-1072, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2437
MAYER, R. C.; DAVIS, J. H.; SCHOORMAN, F. D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, v. 20, n. 3, p. 709-734, 1995. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
MCKNIGHT, D. H.; CARTER, M.; THATCHER, J. B.; CLAY, P. F. Trust in a specific technology: an investigation of its components and measures. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, v. 2, n. 2, e12, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1145/1985347.1985353
MEIJER, S. S.; CATACUTAN, D.; AJAYI, O. C.; SILESHI, G. W.; NIEUWENHUIS, M. The role of knowledge, attitudes and perceptions in the uptake of agricultural and agroforestry innovations among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, v. 13, n. 1, p. 40-54, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2014.912493
NADEEM, F.; JACOBS, B.; CORDELL, D. Adapting to climate change in vulnerable areas: farmers' perceptions in the Punjab, Pakistan. Climate, v. 12, n. 5, e58, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12050058
OUELLETTE, J. A.; WOOD, W. Habit and intention in everyday life: the multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, v. 124, n. 1, p. 54-74, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54
PARC_Pakistan Agricultural Research Council. Agro-ecological regions of Pakistan. Islamabad: PARC, 2024. Available online: https://gaez.fao.org/datasets/agro-ecological-zones-of-pakistan/about.
PODSAKOFF, P. M.; MACKENZIE, S. B.; LEE, J.-Y.; PODSAKOFF, N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, v. 88, n. 5, p. 879-903, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
RAY, S.; DANKS, N. P.; CALERO VALDEZ, A. seminr: building and estimating structural equation models. R package, 2022. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/seminr/index.html.
ROGERS, E. M. Diffusion of innovations. 5. ed. New York: Free Press, 2003. 236p.
SHMUELI, G.; SARSTEDT, M.; HAIR, J. F.; CHEAH, J.-H.; TING, H.; VAITHILINGAM, S.; RINGLE, C. M. Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, v. 53, n. 11, p. 2322-2347, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189
SIEGRIST, M. Trust and risk perception: a critical review of the literature. Risk Analysis, v. 41, n. 3, p. 480-490, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13325
SOK, J.; BORGES, J. R.; SCHMIDT, P.; AJZEN, I. Farmer behaviour as reasoned action: a critical review of research with the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Agricultural Economics, v. 72, n. 2, p. 388-412, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12408
STREUKENS, S.; LEROI-WERELDS, S. Bootstrapping and PLS-SEM: a step-by-step guide to get more out of your bootstrap results. European Management Journal, v. 34, n. 6, p. 618-632, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.06.003
VENTURINI, S.; MEHMETOGLU, M. plssem: a Stata package for structural equation modeling with partial least squares. Journal of Statistical Software, v. 88, n. 8, p. 1-35, 2019. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v088.i08
VILLAMAYOR-TOMAS, S.; SAGEBIEL, J.; ROMMEL, J.; OLSCHEWSKI, R. Types of collective action problems and farmers' willingness to accept agri-environmental schemes in Switzerland. Ecosystem Services, v. 50, e101304, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101304
WANG, G.; LU, Q.; CAPAREDA, S. C. Social network and extension service in farmers' agricultural technology adoption efficiency. PLOS One, v. 15, n. 7, e0235927, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235927
WAUTERS, E.; BIELDERS, C.; POESEN, J.; GOVERS, G.; MATHIJS, E. Adoption of soil conservation practices in Belgium: an examination of the theory of planned behaviour in the agri-environmental domain. Land Use Policy, v. 27, n. 1, p. 86-94, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.009
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Cómo citar
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Hafiz Muhammad Mohsin Raza, Sher Muhammad, Muhammad Ali, Muhammad Shaukat, Muhammad Tahir, Hifsa Rehman, Amina Batool, Adnan Arshad, Muhammad Safdar, Daniel Carneirode Abreu, Paulo Sérgio da Silva Rodrigues

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Los derechos de autor de los artículos publicados en esta revista pertenecen al autor, con los derechos de primera publicación de la revista. En virtud de aparecer en esta revista de acceso público, los artículos son de libre uso, con sus propias atribuciones, en aplicaciones educativas y no comerciales.
Los artículos publicados en esta revista pueden ser reproducidos parcialmente o utilizados como referencia por otros autores, siempre que se mencione la fuente, es decir, Revista Nativa.

