MULTIFUNCTIONAL RURAL LANDSCAPE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND BIBLIOMETRIC PERSPECTIVE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31413/nat.v12i2.17021
Palavras-chave:
multifunctional , rural landscape, bibliometrics, scientometric analysis, research reviewResumo
ABSTRACT: This study offers a glimpse into the research direction of “Multifunctional” and “Rural Landscape” by using a bibliometric research approach as well as the VosViewer quantitative analysis software, presenting the knowledge structure of the field with a scientific knowledge map, mainly in the form of information visualization. Based on the quantitative analysis of the bibliographic data, the study reveals three thematic clusters for this research direction in the Web of Science database: first, “ecosystem services” and “management”; second, “multifunctional agriculture,” “land-use”; third, “sustainability,” “diversity.” These three thematic clusters clarify the current state of research on Multifunctional Rural Landscape and provide a reference for subsequent research. The study suggests that future research will be situated in the post-epidemic era and the contemporary context of the fourth industrial revolution, based on its combination of rural landscape with a study on rural landscape perception experience, to form new research themes.
Keywords: multifunctional; rural landscape; bibliometrics; analysis; research review.
Paisagem rural multifuncional: uma revisão sistemática e perspectiva bibliométrica
RESUMO: Este estudo oferece um vislumbre da direção de investigação "Multifuncional" e "Paisagem Rural", utilizando uma abordagem de investigação bibliométrica, bem como o software de análise quantitativa VosViewer, apresentando a estrutura de conhecimento do campo com um mapa de conhecimento científico, principalmente sob a forma de visualização de informação. Com base na análise quantitativa dos dados bibliográficos, o estudo revela três grupos temáticos para esta direção de investigação na base de dados Web of Science: primeiro, "serviços ecossistêmicos" e "gestão"; segundo, "agricultura multifuncional", "uso da terra"; terceiro, "sustentabilidade", "diversidade". Estes três grupos temáticos clarificam o estado atual da investigação sobre a Paisagem Rural Multifuncional e fornecem uma referência para a investigação subsequente. O estudo sugere que a futura direção da investigação se situará na era pós-epidémica e no contexto contemporâneo da quarta revolução industrial, com base na combinação da paisagem rural com a experiência de percepção da paisagem rural, para formar novos temas de investigação.
Palavras-chave: multifuncional; paisagem rural; bibliometria; análise; revisão da investigação.
Referências
ANTROP, M. Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 70, n. 1–2, p. 21-34, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002
BAIER-FUENTES, H.; MERIGÓ, J. M.; AMORÓS, J. E.; GAVIRIA-MARÍN, M. International entrepreneurship: A bibliometric overview. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, v. 15, n. 2, p. 385-429, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0487-y
BUREL, F. Hedgerows and their role in agricultural landscapes. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, v. 15, n. 2, p. 169-190, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1080/713608130
BOLLIGER, J.; BÄTTIG, M.; GALLATI, J.; KLÄY, A.; STAUFFACHER, M.; KIENAST, F. Landscape multifunctionality: a powerful concept to identify effects of environmental change. Regional Environmental Change, v. 11, n. 1, p. 203-206, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-010-0185-6
CHEN, Y.; WEI, W. Alterations of historic rural landscape based on the multifunctional approach: the case of coastal fishing villages in the Yangtze River Basin. Sustainability, v. 14, n. 12, e745, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127451
CHEN, H.; WANG, M.; ZHANG, Z. Research on rural landscape preference based on TikTok short video content and user comments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 19, n. 16, e10115. 2022. https://doi.org/10/grg2nd
COLARES, G. S.; DELL’OSBEL, N.; WIESEL, P. G.; OLIVEIRA, G. A.; LEMOS, P. H. Z.; DA SILVA, F. P.; LUTTERBECK, C. A.; KIST, L. T.; MACHADO, Ê. L. floating treatment wetlands: a review and bibliometric analysis. Science of The Total Environment, v. 714, e136776, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136776
FAYET, C. M. J.; REILLY, K. H.; VAN HAM, C.; VERBURG, P. H. What is the future of abandoned agricultural lands? A systematic review of alternative trajectories in Europe. Land Use Policy, v. 112, e10583, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105833
GONG, J.; JIN, T.; LIU, D.; ZHU, Y.; YAN, L. Are ecosystem service bundles useful for mountainous landscape function zoning and management? A case study of Bailongjiang watershed in western China. Ecological Indicators, v. 134, e108495, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108495
HOLMES, J. Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: Gaps in the research agenda. Journal of Rural Studies, v. 22, n. 2, p. 142-160, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.08.006
IBÁÑEZ-JIMÉNEZ, Á.; JIMÉNEZ-OLIVENCIA, Y.; MESA-PEDRAZAS, Á.; PORCEL-RODRÍGUEZ, L.; ZIMMERER, K. A Systematic review of EU-Funded innovative agri-food projects: potential for transfer between territories. Land, v. 11, n. 4, e04, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11040519
LIAO, G.; HE, P.; GAO, X.; LIN, Z.; HUANG, C.; ZHOU, W.; DENG, O.; XU, C.; DENG, L. Land use optimization of rural production–living–ecological space at different scales based on the BP–ANN and CLUE–S models. Ecological Indicators, v. 137, e108710, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108710
LIU, Y. Introduction to land use and rural sustainability in China. Land Use Policy, v. 74, p. 1-4, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.032
MOUSTAKAS, L. A Bibliometric Analysis of research on social cohesion from 1994-2020. Publications, v. 10, n. 1, a1, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10010005
PLIENINGER, T.; HARTEL, T.; MARTIN-LOPEZ, B.; BEAUFOY, G.; BERGMEIER, E.; KIRBY, K.; JESUS MONTERO, M.; MORENO, G.; OTEROS-ROZAS, E.; VAN UYTVANCK, J. Wood-pastures of Europe: geographic coverage, social-ecological values, conservation management, and policy implications. Biological Conservation, v. 190, p. 70-79, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.05.014
RENTING, H.; ROSSING, W. A. H.; GROOT, J. C. J.; VAN DER PLOEG, J. D.; LAURENT, C.; PERRAUD, D.; STOBBELAAR, D. J.; VAN ITTERSUM, M. K. Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 90, p. S112–S123, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.014
SANTORO, A.; VENTURI, M.; BERTANI, R.; AGNOLETTI, M. A Review of the role of forests and agroforestry systems in the FAO Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) Programme. Forests, v. 11, n. 8, e860, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11080860
STOATE, C.; BOATMAN, N. D.; BORRALHO, R. J.; CARVALHO, C. R.; DE SNOO, G. R.; EDEN, P. Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 63, n. 4, p. 337-365, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2001.0473
SUN, X.; YANG, P.; TAO, Y.; BIAN, H. Improving ecosystem services supply provides insights for sustainable landscape planning: A case study in Beijing, China. Science of The Total Environment, v. 802, e149849, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149849
THANH, L. H.; NHAT, L. T.; DANG, H. N.; HO, T. M. H.; LEBAILLY, P. One Village One Product (OVOP) - rural development strategy and the early adaption in Vietnam, the case of Quang Ninh Province. Sustainability, v. 10, n. 12, e4485, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124485
VAN ECK, N. J.; WALTMAN, L. Visualizing Bibliometric Networks. In: DING, Y.; ROUSSEAU, R.; WOLFRAM, D. (Eds.) Measuring Scholarly Impact. Springer International Publishing, 2014. p. 285-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
WILLEMEN, L.; HEIN, L.; VAN MENSVOORT, M. E. F.; VERBURG, P. H. Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region. Ecological Indicators, v. 10, n. 1, p. 62-73, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.02.015
YANG, X. S.; XU, H. Producing an ideal village: Imagined rurality, tourism and rural gentrification in China. Journal of Rural Studies, v. 96, p. 1-10, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.10.005
ZHANG, X.; ESTOQUE, R. C.; XIE, H.; MURAYAMA, Y.; RANAGALAGE, M Bibliometric analysis of highly cited articles on ecosystem services. Plos One, v. 14, n. 2, e0210707, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210707
ZHUANG, Q. D.; HUSSEIN, M. K.; ARIFFIN, N. F. M.; YUNOS, M. Y. M. Landscape character: A knowledge mapping analysis using CiteSpace. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, v. 19, n. 10, p. 10477–10492, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04279-5
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Nativa
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Direitos Autorais para artigos publicados nesta revista são do autor, com direitos de primeira publicação para a revista. Em virtude de a aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não-comerciais.
A artigos publicados nessa revista, podem ser reproduzidos parcialmente ou utilizados como referência por outros autores, desde que seja cita a fonte, ou seja, a Revista Nativa.
Copyright for articles published in this journal are the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal shows open access, and articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and non-commercial.
The articles published in this journal may be reproduced in part or used as a reference by other authors, provided that the source is quoted.
