EXPLORING PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF PROTOTYPE RURAL LANDSCAPES IN CONTEMPORARY CHINA: A SURVEY-BASED STUDY
DOI:
10.31413/nat.v11i4.16729Palavras-chave:
prototype rural landscapes, public perception, landscape design, community developmentResumo
The present study delves into the public perceptions concerning prototype rural landscapes in China, aiming to unravel respondents’ varied layers of appreciation, concerns, and aspirations. Employing a quantitative approach through a structured questionnaire, the survey collected insights from a diverse demographic to unveil compelling facets of rural landscape perceptions. The findings revealed a collective admiration for cultural heritage preservation, natural beauty, and traditional architectural styles within rural settings. However, amidst this appreciation, concerns regarding infrastructural deficiencies, environmental sustainability, and socio-economic disparities emerged. These insights underscore the necessity of integrating public perceptions into future landscape planning endeavors to develop culturally resonant, sustainable and community-centric rural landscapes. Recommendations for future research highlight avenues for deeper exploration, emphasizing the need for innovative strategies to bridge infrastructural gaps, enhance environmental sustainability, and empower communities in shaping the future of rural landscapes in China.
Keywords: prototype rural landscapes; public perception; landscape design; community development.
Explorando as percepções públicas dos protótipos de paisagens rurais na China contemporânea: um estudo baseado em pesquisas
RESUMO: O presente estudo investiga as percepções do público sobre os protótipos de paisagens rurais na China, com o objetivo de desvendar as diversas camadas de apreciação, preocupações e aspirações dos entrevistados. Empregando uma abordagem quantitativa, através de um questionário estruturado, recolheu-SE informações de um grupo demográfico diversificado para revelar facetas convincentes das percepções daS paisagens rurais. As descobertas revelaram uma admiração coletiva pela preservação do património cultural, pela beleza natural e pelos estilos arquitetônicos tradicionais em ambientes rurais. No entanto, no meio desta apreciação, surgiram preocupações relativas às deficiências infra-estruturais, à sustentabilidade ambiental e às disparidades socioeconômicas. Estas percepções sublinham a necessidade de integrar as percepções do público nos futuros esforços de planeamento paisagístico para desenvolver paisagens rurais culturalmente ressonantes, sustentáveis e centradas na comunidade. As recomendações para pesquisas futuras destacam caminhos para uma exploração mais profunda, enfatizando a necessidade de estratégias inovadoras para colmatar lacunas infra-estruturais, melhorar a sustentabilidade ambiental e capacitar as comunidades na definição do futuro das paisagens rurais na China.
Palavras-chave: protótipo de paisagens rurais; percepção pública; projeto paisagístico; desenvolvimento comunitário.
Referências
CATTANEO, T.; GIORGI, E.; NI, M. Landscape, architecture and environmental regeneration: a research by design approach for inclusive tourism in a rural village in China. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 1, e128, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010128
CHEN, N.; POW, C. P. Articulating relational rurality amidst urbanization: Agency, spatial paradox and the de/reterritorialization of lineage landscapes in contemporary rural China. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, e12621, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12621
CHEN, Y.; YU, Z.; LI, X.; LI, P. How agricultural multiple ecosystem services respond to socioeconomic factors in Mengyin County, China. Science of the Total Environment, v. 630, p. 1003–1015, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.187
FANG, C.; LI, G.; WANG, S. Changing and differentiated urban landscape in China: spatiotemporal patterns and driving forces. Environmental Science & Technology, v. 50, n. 5, p. 2217–2227, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05198
GARCÍA-MARTÍN, M.; PLIENINGER, T.; BIELING, C. Dimensions of landscape stewardship across europe: landscape values, place attachment, awareness, and personal responsibility. Sustainability, v. 10, n. 1, e263, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010263
GOTTWALD, S.; ALBERT, C.; FAGERHOLM, N. Combining a sense of place theory with the ecosystem services concept: empirical insights and reflections from a participatory mapping study. Landscape Ecology, v. 37, n. 2, p. 633–655, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01362-z
HALE, D. C.; MORZILLO, A. T. Landscape characteristics and social factors influencing attitudes toward roadside vegetation management. Landscape Ecology, v. 35, n. 9, p. 2029–2044, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01078-6
HE, B.; ZHU, J. Constructing community gardens? Residents’ attitude and behaviour towards edible landscapes in emerging urban communities of China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, v. 34, p. 154-165, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.06.015
HE, S.; ZHANG, Y. Reconceptualising the rural through planetary thinking: A field experiment of sustainable approaches to rural revitalisation in China. Journal of Rural Studies, v. 96, p. 42-52, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.10.008
HEPBURN, C.; YE, Q.; STERN, N.; WARD, B.; XIE, C.; ZENGHELIS, D. Towards carbon neutrality and China’s 14th Five-Year Plan: Clean energy transition, sustainable urban development, and investment priorities. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, v. 8, e100130, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2021.100130
HOLTORF, C.; HÖGBERG, A. Cultural heritage and the future. London: Routledge eBooks, 2020. 300p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315644615
KÜHNE, O. Landscape and power in geographical space as a social-aesthetic construct. London: Springer eBooks, 2018. 256p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72902-2
LI, J.; DONG, H.; JIANG, J. Prototyping in the design of built landscapes. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, v. 8, n. 4, e90, 2020. https://doi.org/10.15302/j-laf-1-030018
LI, Q.; WUMAIER, K.; ISHIKAWA, M. The Spatial Analysis and sustainability of rural cultural landscapes: Linpan settlements in China’s Chengdu Plain. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 16, e4431, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164431
LIU, W.; YANG, X.; SHOUQIN, Z.; SISSOKO, F.; WEI, C. Can community-based concentration revitalise the upland villages? A case comparison of two villages in Chongqing, Southwestern China. Habitat International, v. 77, p. 153-166, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.11.005
LONG, H.; KONG, X.; HU, S.; LI, Y. Land Use Transitions under Rapid Urbanization: A Perspective from Developing China. Land, v. 10, n. 9, e935, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10090935
LONG, H.; ZHANG, Y.; TU, S. Rural vitalization in China: A perspective of land consolidation. Journal of Geographical Sciences, v. 29, n. 4, p. 517-530, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-019-1599-9
MA, W.; JIANG, G.; ZHANG, R.; LI, Y.; JIANG, X. Achieving rural spatial restructuring in China: A suitable framework to understand how structural transitions in rural residential land differ across peri-urban interface? Land Use Policy, v. 75, p. 583-593, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.024
MARQUES, B.; MCINTOSH, J.; HATTON, W.; SHANAHAN, D. F. Bicultural landscapes and ecological restoration in the compact city: The case of Zealandia as a sustainable ecosanctuary. Journal of Landscape Architecture, v. 14, n. 1, p. 44-53, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2019.1623545
MENG, H.; ZHANG, Y.; ZHANG, H.; LU, Y.; ZUO, L.; ZHUANG, M.; LIU, W.; ZHANG, J.; ZHANG, H. How do Chinese tourists perceive tranquillity during the tour? Tourism Management Perspectives, v. 34, e100666, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100666
PANG, B. The postmonolingual turn: rethinking embodiment with New Confucianism in bodily education and research. Sport, Education and Society, v. 27, n. 8, p. 893-905, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2021.1953461
PASINI, R. Landscape paradigms and post-urban spaces: A Journey Through the Regions of Landscape. London: Springer Cham, 2018. 226p.
RATTRAY, J.; JONES, M. Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. Journal of Clinical Nursing, v. 16, n. 2, p. 234-243, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x
TAROLLI, P.; STRAFFELINI, E. Agriculture in hilly and mountainous landscapes: Threats, monitoring and sustainable management. Geography and Sustainability, v. 1, n. 1, p. 70-76, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.03.003
TIANMING, G.; ИВОЛГА, А.; EROKHIN, V. Sustainable Rural Development in Northern China: Caught in a Vice between Poverty, Urban Attractions, and Migration. Sustainability, v. 10, n. 5, e1467, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051467
WEI, Z.; LI, J. C. Rural public space design in China’s western regions: Territorial landscape aesthetics and sustainable development from a tourism perspective. Urban Resilience and Sustainability, v. 1, n. 3, p. 188-213, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3934/urs.2023013
XUE, Y.; MAO, K.; WEEKS, N.; XIAO, J. Rural reform in contemporary China: development, efficiency, and fairness. Journal of Contemporary China, v. 30, n. 128, p. 266-282, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2020.1790902
YE, C.; PAN, J.; LIU, Z. The historical logics and geographical patterns of rural-urban governance in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, v. 32, n. 7, p. 1225–124，2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-022-1994-5
ZANG, Y.; LIU, Y.; YANG, Y.; WOODS, M.; FOIS, F. Rural decline or restructuring? Implications for sustainability transitions in rural China. Land Use Policy, v. 94, e104531, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104531
ZHANG, S. Public participation in the Geoweb era: Defining a typology for geo-participation in local governments. Cities, v. 85, p. 38-50, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.004
ZHAO, X.; GREENOP, K. From ‘neo-vernacular’ to ‘semi-vernacular’: a case study of vernacular architecture representation and adaptation in rural Chinese village revitalization. International Journal of Heritage Studies, v. 25, n. 11, p. 1128-1147, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2019.1570544
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Nativa
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Direitos Autorais para artigos publicados nesta revista são do autor, com direitos de primeira publicação para a revista. Em virtude de a aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não-comerciais.
A artigos publicados nessa revista, podem ser reproduzidos parcialmente ou utilizados como referência por outros autores, desde que seja cita a fonte, ou seja, a Revista Nativa.
Copyright for articles published in this journal are the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal shows open access, and articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and non-commercial.
The articles published in this journal may be reproduced in part or used as a reference by other authors, provided that the source is quoted.
