Nativa, Sinop, v. 10, n. 3, p. 319-327, 2022.
Pesquisas Agrárias e Ambientais
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v10i3.13332 ISSN: 2318-7670
Soil waterlogging associated with iron excess potentiates physiological
damage to soybean leaves
Allan de Marcos LAPAZ1*, Camila Hatsu Pereira YOSHIDA2, Carlos Leonardo Pereira BOGAS3,
Liliane Santos de CAMARGOS1, Paulo Alexandre Monteiro de FIGUEIREDO3,
Jailson Vieira AGUILAR1, Ronaldo Cintra LIMA3, Rafael Simões TOMAZ
1São Paulo State University (UNESP), Ilha Solteira, SP, Brazil.
2University of Western São Paulo (UNOESTE), Presidente Prudente, SP, Brazil.
3São Paulo State University (UNESP), Dracena, SP, Brazil.
E-mail: allanlapz60@gmail.com
ORCID: (0000-0003-4798-3713; 0000-0002-8167-3324; 0000-0002-1190-6233; 0000-0002-0979-4447;
0000-0003-4505-6975; 0000-0003-3684-9180; 0000-0001-8316-7145; 0000-0002-5700-5983)
Submitted on 01/17/2022; Accepted on 07/18/2022; Published on 08/19/2022.
ABSTRACT: Many plants are exposed to soil waterlogging, including soybean plants. Soil waterlogging
exponentially increases the availability of iron (Fe) and causes O2 depletion, which may result in excessive uptake
of Fe and shortage of O2 to the roots and also nodules in leguminous plants, resulting in overproduction of
reactive oxygen species and lipid peroxidation. The present study aimed to evaluate physiological damage to
soybean leaves at the second trifoliate (V2) stage when exposed to non-waterlogged and waterlogged soils and
combined with one moderate and two toxic levels of Fe. Soybean plants were vulnerable to soil waterlogging
at all Fe levels tested, presenting the highest values of malonaldehyde, hydrogen peroxide, and Fe accumulation
in the shoot, which resulted in accentuated damage to gas exchange and chlorophyll content, consequently
leading to lower shoot dry weight. In contrast, soybean plants cultivated under optimal water availability showed
less damage caused by excess Fe, mainly at 125 mg dm-3 Fe, since the traits of net photosynthetic rate, water
use efficiency, instantaneous carboxylation efficiency, malonaldehyde, and shoot dry weight were not affected.
Keywords: chlorophylls; gas exchange; Glycine max; ferrous ion.
Encharcamento do solo associado ao excesso de ferro potencializa os danos
fisiológicos às folhas de soja
RESUMO: Muitas plantas estão expostas ao encharcamento do solo, incluindo plantas de soja. O
encharcamento do solo aumenta exponencialmente a disponibilidade de ferro (Fe) no solo e causa depleção de
O2, o que pode resultar na absorção excessiva de Fe e escassez de O2 para as raízes e também nódulos em
plantas leguminosas, resultando em superprodução de espécies reativas de oxigênio e peroxidação lipídica. O
presente estudo teve como objetivo avaliar os danos fisiológicos às folhas de soja no segundo estádio trifoliado
(V2) quando exposta a solos não encharcados e encharcados combinado com um nível moderado e dois níveis
tóxicos de Fe. As plantas de soja foram vulneráveis ao encharcamento do solo em todos os níveis de Fe testados,
apresentando os maiores valores de malonaldeído, peróxido de hidrogênio e acúmulo de Fe na parte aérea, o
que resultou em danos acentuados nas trocas gasosas e no conteúdo de clorofila, consequentemente levando a
menor peso seco de parte aérea. Em contrapartida, plantas de soja cultivadas sob disponibilidade hídrica ótima
apresentaram menos danos causados pelo excesso de Fe, principalmente a 125 mg dm-3 Fe, uma vez que as
características de taxa fotossintética líquida, eficiência do uso da água, eficiência de carboxilação instantânea,
malonaldeído e peso seca da parte aérea não foram afetados.
Palavras-chave: clorofilas; trocas gasosas; Glycine max; íon ferroso.
1. INTRODUCTION
An increase in the occurrence of extreme weather events
is expected due to variation in average rainfall and storms,
resulting in drought and waterlogging of the soil in several
regions of the world (LORETI et al., 2016). Soil waterlogging
leads to considerable losses in agricultural production
(PEDO et al., 2015; RHINE et al., 2010), especially in soils
with high water tables, compacted soils with poor drainage
(BATAGLIA; MASCARENHAS, 1981; KOKUBUN,
2013), and in lowland soils (PEDÓ et al., 2015).
Gaseous exchange between soil and atmosphere are
severely affected in waterlogged soils (GREENWAY et al.,
2006). Besides that, soil structure is destroyed, which causes
dispersion of soil aggregates; consequently, soil pores are
blocked by particles, impeding air and water movement in
soil (RODRÍGUEZ-GAMIR et al., 2011). In waterlogged
conditions, O2 has low solubility and a low diffusion rate
relative to air, which directly affects its supply to the roots
and also nodules in leguminous plants (GREENWAY et al.,
2006; VOESENEK et al., 2006).
Depending on the duration of soil waterlogging, partial
(hypoxia) or complete (anoxia) depletion of O2 may occur by
aerobic microorganisms and plants. With the absence of O2
root tissue, oxidative phosphorylation in the mitochondria is
Soil waterlogging associated with iron excess potentiates physiological damage to soybean leaves
Nativa, Sinop, v. 10, n. 3, p. 319-327, 2022.
320
negligible and ATP synthesis is restricted to substrate
phosphorylation in glycolysis via fermentative pathways
(SCHULZE et al., 2019), which consequently results in a
decline of N-fixation in leguminous plants and in ATP
synthesis (SOUZA et al., 2016).
In leaves, during waterlogging, one of the first detectable
effects is decreased CO2 availability due to reduced stomatal
opening, affecting gas exchange and water status of the plants
(ZHANG et al., 2016; YAN et al., 2018). Consequently,
blockage of the photosynthetic electron transport chain and
a limitation on CO2 assimilation by the Calvin-Benson cycle
may occur, inducing a marked production of reactive oxygen
species (ROS) production (ZHENG et al., 2017; YAN et al.,
2018). The Excess energy in the antenna complex and ion
leakage from the electron transport chain is transferred to O2,
inducing over-production of singlet oxygen (1O2) and
hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (BARBOSA et al., 2014; ZHENG
et al., 2017). In addition, the reduced ferredoxin electron is
transferred to O2, instead of going to NADP, generating a
superoxide anion (O2•-) at the acceptor side of photosystem
I (PSI; BARBOSA et al., 2014; YAN et al., 2018).
Concomitantly, under anoxic conditions, the
microorganisms present are anaerobic and facultative
anaerobic. These microorganisms utilise alternative electron
acceptors, preferring those allowing the highest energy yields
or that are most readily available, to maintain their
metabolisms (MARANGUIT et al., 2017; LAPAZ et al.,
2022). Insoluble Fe3+ oxides are electron acceptors of
immediate risk to plants, since they are reduced into a more
soluble form (Fe2+) and released into soil pore water,
resulting in excess absorption of Fe by plants (FREI et al.,
2016; MARANGUIT et al., 2017). High levels of Fe in leaf
tissue may affect the net photosynthetic rate due to
degradation of cell membranes and disruption of
photosynthetic protein complexes such as D1 protein
(MÜLLER et al., 2017), by action of ROS via the Fenton’s
and Haber-Weiss’s reactions (BECANA et al., 1998; LAPAZ
et al., 2022).
There are no previous reports on soil waterlogging
combined with excess Fe in soybean plants in the vegetative
phenological stage. From this perspective, it was
hypothesized that the soil waterlogging combined with Fe
excess can increase the damage to the soybean crop, resulting
in the compromise of its development, since tolerance is
often a product of tolerance to anaerobiosis and to toxicities
of the excessively available elements (SINGH; SETTER,
2017). Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate
physiological damage to leaves and biometric development
traits in soybean plants at the second trifoliate (V2) stage
(FEHR et al., 1971) when exposed to non-waterlogged and
waterlogged soils and combined with one moderate and two
toxic levels of Fe.
2. MATERIAL AND METHODS
2.1. Experimental site and cultivation conditions
The experiment was carried out under greenhouse
conditions at the College of Agricultural and Technological
Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo
State, Brazil (21° 29ʹ S, 51° 2ʹ W; 396 m above sea level). The
soybean variety ‘NS 6601 IPRO’ [Glycine max (L.) Merril] was
used.
The soil was a dystrophic Oxisol (SANTOS et al., 2018).
The soil was collected at a 0.0 0.2 m depth and presented
the following chemical attributes: pH (CaCl2) 4.6, organic
matter 14 g dm-3, P (resin) 4 mg dm-3, K 2.1 mmolc dm-3, Ca
7 mmolc dm-3, Mg 5 mmolc dm-3, S 5 mg dm-3, B 0.09 mg dm-
3, Cu 0.6 mg dm-3, Fe 0.25 mg dm-3, Mn 16.7 mg dm-3, Zn 1
mg dm-3, potential acidity (H + Al) 18 mmolc dm-3, Al 4
mmolc dm-3, sum of bases 14.1 mmolc dm-3, cation exchange
capacity 32.1 mmolc dm-3, and base saturation 44%.
The base saturation of soil was increased to 70%
(QUAGGIO et al., 1985) by adding CaCO3 and MgCO3,
analytical reagent (AR) grade, at a ratio of 3:1. The soil with
the carbonate salts was incubated for 30 days in pots at a
humidity of 80% of field capacity to allow it to equilibrate
(LAPAZ et al., 2020). The pots were polypropylene with a
capacity of 4 dm3, lined with a polystyrene blanket to avoid
soil loss during the experiment.
2.2. Experimental process
The following fertilisation was carried out per pot: 10 mg
dm-3 N as CO(NH2)2, 200 mg dm-3 P as Ca(H2PO4)2·H2O,
150 mg dm-3 K as K2SO4, 0.5 mg dm-3 B as H3BO3, 0.05 mg
dm-3 Co as (CoCl2·H2O), 1.0 mg dm-3 Cu as CuSO4·5H2O,
0.05 mg dm-3 Mo as H2MoO4, 0.05 mg dm-3 Ni as
NiSO4·7H2O, 5.0 mg dm-3 Mn as MnSO4, and 2.0 mg dm-3
Zn as ZnSO4 (LAPAZ et al., 2020). The K supply was split
into three equal applications, which were supplied before
sowing and at the V2 stage (FEHR et al., 1971). Fe, as
FeCl3·6H2O, was supplied at 0, 100, and 475 mg dm-3 to the
soil to give one natural level of 25 mg dm-3 Fe and two high
levels of 125 and 500 mg dm-3 Fe, respectively.
After four days, 10 soybean seeds were sown at a depth
of 3 cm, after inoculation with the N2-fixing bacterium
Bradyrhizobium japonicum (KIRCHNER, 1896) Jordan (1982)
(Bradyrhizobiaceae), strains SEMIA 587 and 5019. At the
first node with unifoliate leaf (V1; FEHR et al., 1971), the
seedlings were thinned to three representative seedlings per
pot, selecting those with greater vigour and homogeneity of
size.
At the V2 stage, the soil was waterlogged for a period of
10 days, totalling 23 days of experimental conduction from
the germination of soybean seeds. The pots undergoing a
waterlogged soil treatment were placed in larger pots with
non-draining bottoms, and the water level in these was
maintained at 2 cm above the soil surface of the inner pot.
During the experimental conduction, the replenishment
of evapotranspired water for the plots was achieved using
suspended micro-sprinklers, which were activated morning
and afternoon. For this, before sowing, field capacity of the
soil [100% water mass (g) that the soil supports] was
determined (IBAÑEZ et al., 2021). In this way, the soil
humidity was maintained at 80% of the field capacity, except
during the 10 days of stress in the pots where the soil was
waterlogged. In these days, all plants were irrigated manually,
respecting the water levels of each plot.
2.3. Measurements of gas exchange
On the 10th day of stress imposition, gas exchange traits
were determined on the first newly expanded trifoliate leaf
(counting from the apex) of two plants from each pot, using
a LCpro portable infrared gas analyser (ADC Bioscientific
Ltd., Hoddesdon, United Kingdom). Evaluations were
performed on a clear day between 10:00 and 11:30a.m.
Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) was standardised
to an artificial saturating light of 1000µmol m-2 s-1, 380 μmol
Lapaz et al.
Nativa, Sinop, v. 10, n. 3, p. 319-327, 2022.
321
CO2 mol-1 air and a chamber temperature of 28°C, according
to Lapaz et al. (2020). The net photosynthetic rate (A, µmol
CO2 m-2 s-1), stomatal conductance (gs, mol H2O m-2 s-1) and
transpiration rate (E, mmol H2O m-2 s-1), water use efficiency
[WUE (A/E), μmol CO2 mmol-1 H2O], and instantaneous
carboxylation efficiency [EiC (A/Ci), mol air-1] were
obtained. Ci (µmol CO2 mol ar-1) is the internal CO2 level in
the substomatal chamber.
Subsequently, at the end of the experiment, the first
newly expanded trifoliate leaves (counting from the apex)
were collected and frozen in liquid nitrogen and the following
traits were measured:
2.4. Determination of photosynthetic pigments
Chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b (Chl b), total
chlorophyll (Tchl), and carotenoid (CAR) contents were
quantified by spectrophotometric method described by
Lichtenthaler; Wellburn (1983). Leaves from two plants in
each pot were assayed. Fresh leaf tissue (0.5 g) was macerated
in 5 mL cold 80% acetone. The results were expressed in as
μg mL-1, and calculated as described by Aguiar et al. (2021).
2.5. Determination of hydrogen peroxide content and
lipid peroxidation amount
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) contents were determined
according to Alexieva et al. (2001). Leaves from two plants
of each pot were assayed. Fresh leaf tissue (0.25 g) was
macerated in 3 mL of 0.1% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) with
20% polyvinylpolypyrrolidone. Subsequently, the samples
were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. For the
reaction, 0.2 mL of supernatant was added to 0.2 mL 100 mM
potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.5 and 800 μL 1 M KI
solution. The samples were kept on ice for one hour, and
then absorbance readings were taken at 390 nm. The H2O2
content was calculated based on a standard curve of H2O2,
and the results were expressed in nmol g-1 FW.
Lipid peroxidation was evaluated by determining the
amount of malondialdehyde (MDA) reactive to 2-
thiobarbituric acid (TBA), as described by Heath and Packer
(1968). The initial procedures for MDA measurement were
the same as those described above for H2O2 measurements.
Following centrifugation, 0.25 mL of supernatant was added
to 1 mL 20% TCA solution containing 0.5% TBA. The
samples were kept in a dry bath at 95°C for 30 min and then
on ice for 20min. Subsequently, the samples were
centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5min and supernatants were
read at 535 and 600 nm. The results were expressed in nmol
g-1 FW and calculated as described by Lapaz et al. (2020).
2.6. Soybean development and Fe accumulation in
shoots
The shoot was cut close to the collar with the aid of
cutting pliers. The samples were packaged in paper bags and
oven dried at 65°C for 72 h, followed by the determined of
shoot dry weight (SDW). The results were expressed as g
plant-1.
The samples were ground in a Wiley-type mill and
submitted to digestion with nitric-perchloric acid solution
(3:1) at 200°C (MALAVOLTA et al., 1997) to determine the
Fe accumulation in the shoot (FeAS). Next, Fe concentration
was determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry.
FeAS (µg SDW-1) was calculated by multiplying Fe
concentration by the SDW (LAPAZ et al., 2020).
2.7. Experimental design and data analysis
The experimental design was completely randomised and
arranged in a 2 × 3 factorial scheme, with two water regimes
in the soil (optimum and waterlogged conditions) and three
soil Fe levels (25, 125, and 500 mg dm-3). Each pot contained
three plants, giving a final population of nine plants per
treatment.
Normality and homoscedasticity of the data were
analysed using the Shapiro-Wilk’s and Bartlett’s tests (p <
0.05). Then, the data were subjected to analysis of variance
(ANOVA) using the F test (p 0.05). The traits were
compared using the Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Chl a was
transformed by x. Statistical analysis was performed in the
R software (R Development Core Team, 2019).
3. RESULTS
3.1. Gas exchange and photosynthesis pigment content
A showed a significant effect of double interaction on
ANOVA (Table 1). Plants cultivated under optimal water
availability showed no difference in A. Conversely, there was
a reduction in A under waterlogged soil associated with 125
and 500 mg dm-3 Fe, which resulted in lower values when
compared to those under optimal water availability (Figure
1).
Figure 1. Net photosynthetic rate of soybean, based on the
significance of ANOVA by factorial analysis (p 0.05), comprised
of soils with two water regimes (optimum and waterlogged
conditions) and three iron levels (25, 125, and 500 mg dm-3).
Different letters indicate significant differences according to the
Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Uppercase letters compare each water
regime between different iron levels in the soil, while lowercase
letters compare water regimes with the same iron levels. Vertical
bars represent the standard error.
Figura 1. Taxa fotossintética líquida da soja, baseada na significância
da ANOVA por análise fatorial (p ≤ 0,05), composta por solos com
dois regimes hídricos (condições ótimas e encharcadas) e três níveis
de ferro (25, 125 e 500 mg dm-3). Letras diferentes indicam
diferenças significativas de acordo com o teste de Tukey (p < 0,05).
Letras maiúsculas comparam cada regime hídrico entre os diferentes
níveis de ferro no solo, enquanto letras minúsculas comparam os
regimes hídricos com os mesmos níveis de ferro. As barras verticais
representam o erro padrão.
The traits gs, E, and WUE showed an isolated effect for
water regime and Fe level, while EiC showed an isolated
effect only for water regime on ANOVA (Table 1). Plants
subjected to waterlogged soil showed reductions in gs (36%),
E (23.9%), WUE (15.8%), and EiC (5.7%) compared to those
under optimal water availability (Table 2). In relation to Fe,
the greatest reduction in gs and WUE occurred in plants
Soil waterlogging associated with iron excess potentiates physiological damage to soybean leaves
Nativa, Sinop, v. 10, n. 3, p. 319-327, 2022.
322
exposed to 500 mg dm-3 Fe, while E decreased in those
exposed to 125 mg dm-3 Fe (Table 2).
Chl a, Chl b, Tchl, and CAR contents showed an isolated
effect for water regime and Fe level on ANOVA (Table 1).
Plants subjected to waterlogged soil showed reductions in
Chl a (27.7%), Chl b (41.5%), Tchl (80.9%), and CAR (29.7%)
contents compared to those under optimal water availability
(Table 3). There were reductions in Chl a, Chl b, and Tchl
contents in plants cultivated at 125 and 500 mg dm-3. In
contrast, CAR content was less sensitive, showing a
reduction only at 500 mg dm-3 Fe (Table 3).
Table 1. Summary of ANOVA by factorial analysis (p 0.05) composed of soils with two water regimes (optimum and waterlogged
conditions) and three iron levels (25, 125, and 500 mg dm-3) for the soybean traits of net photosynthetic rate (A), stomatal conductance
(gs), transpiration rate (E), water use efficiency (WUE), instantaneous carboxylation efficiency (EiC), chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b
(Chl b), total chlorophyll (Tchl), carotenoids (CAR), malondialdehyde (MDA), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), shoot dry weight (SDW), and
iron accumulation in the shoots (FeAS).
Tabela 1. Resumo da ANOVA por análise fatorial (p0,05) composta de solos com dois regimes hídricos (condições ótimas e encharcadas)
e três níveis de ferro (25, 125 e 500 mg dm-3) para as características de taxa fotossintética líquida (A), condutância estomática (gs), taxa de
transpiração (E), eficiência de uso de água (WUE), eficiência de carboxilação instantânea (EiC), clorofila a (Chl a), clorofila b (Chl b), clorofila
total (Tchl), carotenóides (CAR), malondialdeído (MDA), peróxido de hidrogênio (H2O2), peso seca da parte aérea (SDW) e acúmulo de
ferro na parte aérea (FeAS) da soja.
Traits Waterlogged Iron Interaction
A
***
**
*
gs
***
**
E
*
**
WUE
***
**
EiC
***
ns
Chl
a
***
**
Chl
b
*
*
Tchl
***
**
CAR
**
**
MDA
***
***
**
H
2
O
2
***
***
SDW
***
***
***
FeAS
***
***
Significance: ns, not significant; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Significância: ns, não significativo; *, p < 0,05; **, p < 0,01; ***, p < 0,001.
Table 2. Stomatal conductance (gs, µmol CO2 m-2 s-1), transpiration rate (E, mmol H2O m-2 s-1), water use efficiency (WUE, μmol CO2
mmol-1 H2O), and instantaneous carboxylation efficiency (EiC, mol air-1) of soybean, based on the significance of ANOVA by factorial
analysis (p 0.05), comprised of soils with two water regimes (optimum and waterlogged conditions) and three iron levels (25, 125, and 500
mg dm-3).
Tabela 2. Condutância estomática (gs, µmol CO2 m-2 s-1), taxa de transpiração (E, mmol H2O m-2 s-1), eficiência do uso da água (WUE,
μmol CO2 mmol-1 H2O) e eficiência de carboxilação instantânea (EiC, mol air-1) da soja, baseada na significância da ANOVA por análise
fatorial (p ≤ 0,05), composta por solos com dois regimes hídricos (condições ótimas e encharcadas) e três níveis de ferro (25, 125 e 500 mg
dm-3).
Factor levels
gs
E
WUE
EiC
Water regimes
Optimum
0.30A ± 0.01
5.79A ± 0.18
1.77A
± 0.31
0.035A ± 0.0009
Waterlogged
0.19B ± 0.01
4.46B ± 0.26
1.49B
± 0.13
0.024B ± 0.0015
Iron levels
25
0.28a ± 0.02
5.80a ± 0.26
1.65ab
± 0.36
0.033a ± 0.0016
125
0.23b ± 0.02
4.87b ± 0.37
1.78a
± 0.12
0.030a ± 0.0028
500
0.13b
± 0.02
5.16ab
± 0.30
1.46b
± 0.11
0.027a
± 0.0030
Different letters indicate significant differences according to the Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Uppercase letters compare water regimes, while lowercase letters
compare iron levels. ± means standard error.
Letras diferentes indicam diferenças significativas de acordo com o teste de Tukey (p < 0,05). Letras maiúsculas comparam os regimes hídricos, enquanto as
letras minúsculas comparam os níveis de ferro. ± significa o erro padrão.
3.2. Toxicity and Fe accumulation in shoots
Amount of MDA and SDW showed a significant effect
of double interaction, while H2O2 content and FeAS showed
an isolated effect for water regimes and Fe levels on ANOVA
(Table 1). At 500 mg dm-3 Fe, an increase was observed in
amount of MDA in both water regimes compared to plants
at 25 mg dm-3 Fe under optimal water availability (Figure 2a).
Amount of MDA was higher in plants cultivated under
waterlogged soil than those with optimal water availability
(Figure 2a), registering an average increase of 62%.
SDW showed a decrease of 13.7% in plants cultivated
under optimal water availability only at 500 mg dm-3 Fe
compared to plants cultivated under optimal water
availability at 25 mg dm-3 Fe (Figure 2b). Excess Fe
potentiated this reduction in SDW when associated with soil
waterlogging, recording reductions of 43.1 and 78.4% at 125
and 500 mg dm-3 Fe, respectively, compared to plants at 25
mg dm-3 Fe under optimal water availability. SDW was higher
in plants cultivated under optimal water availability than in
waterlogged soil (Figure 2b).
Plants exposed to waterlogged soil showed the highest
contents of H2O2 and FeAS (12.1 and 92.8%, respectively) in
relation to those under optimal water availability (Table 4).
There was a progressive increase in H2O2 in response to
excess Fe, whereas FeAS only increased at 500 mg dm-3 Fe
(Table 4).
Lapaz et al.
Nativa, Sinop, v. 10, n. 3, p. 319-327, 2022.
323
Figure 2. Amount of malonaldehyde (MDA, a) and shoot dry weight (SDW, b) of soybean, based on the significance of ANOVA by factorial
analysis (p0.05), comprised of soils with two water regimes (optimum and waterlogged conditions) and three iron levels (25, 125, and 500
mg dm-3). Different letters indicate significant differences according to the Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Uppercase letters compare each water
regime between different iron levels in the soil, while lowercase letters compare water regimes with the same iron levels. Vertical bars
represent the standard error.
Figura 2. Quantidade de malondialdeído (MDA, a) e peso seco da parte aérea (SDW, b) da soja, baseada na significância da ANOVA por
análise fatorial (p ≤ 0,05), composta por solos com dois regimes hídricos (condições ótimas e encharcadas) e três níveis de ferro (25, 125 e
500 mg dm-3). Letras diferentes indicam diferenças significativas de acordo com o teste de Tukey (p < 0,05). Letras maiúsculas comparam
cada regime hídrico entre os diferentes níveis de ferro no solo, enquanto letras minúsculas comparam os regimes hídricos com os mesmos
níveis de ferro. As barras verticais representam o erro padrão.
Table 3. Chlorophyll a (Chl a, μg mL-1), chlorophyll b (Chl b, μg mL-1), total chlorophyll (Tchl, μg mL-1) e carotenoid (CAR, μg mL-1)
contents of soybean, based on the significance of ANOVA by factorial analysis (p 0.05), comprised of soils with two water regimes
(optimum and waterlogged conditions) and three iron levels (25, 125, and 500 mg dm-3).
Tabela 3. Conteúdo de clorofila a (Chl a, μg mL-1), clorofila b (Chl b μg mL-1), clorofila total (Tchl, μg mL-1) e carotenoides (CAR, μg mL-
1) da soja, baseada na significância da ANOVA por análise fatorial (p 0,05), composta por solos com dois regimes hídricos (condições
ótimas e encharcadas) e três níveis de ferro (25, 125 e 500 mg dm-3).
Factor levels
Chl
a
Chl
b
Tchl
CAR
Water regimes
Optimum
12.82A ± 0.72
6.22A ± 1.00
19.05A ± 1.64
8.44A ± 0.87
Waterlogged
9.27B ± 0.36
3.64B ± 0.25
12.91B ± 0.60
5.93B ± 0.37
Iron levels
25
12.82a ± 1.02
6.69a ± 1.47
19.52a ± 2.41
8.99a ± 1.12
125
10.22b ± 0.92
4.10b ± 0.43
14.32b ± 1.34
6.93ab ± 0.64
500
10.10b ± 0.78
3.99b ± 0.50
14.10b ± 1.27
5.64b ± 0.52
Different letters indicate significant differences according to the Tukey test (p < 0.05). Uppercase letters compare water regimes regardless of iron level, while
isolated lowercase letters compare iron levels regardless of water regime. ± means standard error.
Letras diferentes indicam diferenças significativas de acordo com o teste de Tukey (p < 0,05). Letras maiúsculas comparam cada regime hídrico entre diferentes
níveis de ferro no solo, enquanto letras minúsculas comparam os regimes hídricos com os mesmos níveis de ferro. ± significa o erro padrão.
Table 4. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, nmol g-1 FW) content and iron accumulation in the shoots (FeAS, µg SDW-1) of soybean, based on the
significance of ANOVA by factorial analysis (p ≤ 0.05), comprised of soils with two water regimes (optimum and waterlogged conditions)
and three iron levels (25, 125, and 500 mg dm-3).
Tabela 4. Conteúdo de peróxido de hidrogênio (H2O2, nmol g-1 FW e acúmulo de ferro na parte aérea ((FeAS, µg SDW-1) da soja, baseada
na significância da ANOVA por análise fatorial (p ≤ 0,05), composta por solos com dois regimes hídricos (condições ótimas e encharcadas)
e três níveis de ferro (25, 125 e 500 mg dm-3).
Factor levels
H
2
O
2
FeAS
Water regimes
Optimum
171.26B ± 9.15
232.65B ± 30.93
Waterlogged
192.00A ± 11.41
448.63A ± 39.57
Iron levels
25
145.34c ± 9.42
308.48b ± 44.42
125
181.63b ±
7.56
302.63b ± 48.10
500
209.86a ± 12.45
519.72a ± 56.15
Different letters indicate significant differences according to the Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Uppercase letters compare water regimes, while isolated lowercase
letters compare iron levels. ± means standard error.
Letras diferentes indicam diferenças significativas de acordo com o teste de Tukey (p < 0,05). Letras maiúsculas comparam os regimes hídricos, enquanto as
letras minúsculas comparam os níveis de ferro. ± significa o erro padrão.
Soil waterlogging associated with iron excess potentiates physiological damage to soybean leaves
Nativa, Sinop, v. 10, n. 3, p. 319-327, 2022.
324
4. DISCUSSION
4.1. Impact on gas exchange
The gs and EiC showed decreases under soil
waterlogging, configuring stomatal and biochemical
limitations, which reflected in a lower A (Figure 1 and Table
2). The decrease in gs (Table 2) detected under soil
waterlogging was probably an adaptive defence measure to
prevent water loss and dehydration of tissues (YAN et al.,
2018). Although soybean plants present morphological
adaptations to tolerate waterlogging (THOMAS et al., 2005),
they suffer until they develop a sufficient aerenchymatous
network for the diffusion of O2 to the roots (SHIMAMURA
et al., 2010). With the reduction of gs, consequently the E was
reduced; however, it was not enough to optimise the WUE
(Table 2). A similar result was observed by Velasco et al.
(2019) in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), they observed a reduction
in gs under waterlogging prevents water loss by E, but
culminated in a reduction in WUE in the plurality of cultivars
studied.
In relation to the increase Fe levels, gs showed a similar
reduction at 125 and 500 mg dm-3 Fe (Table 2), which may
explain the lower A when combined with waterlogged soil
(Figure 1). Biochemical limitation under Fe excess was not
verified in EiC (Table 2). Conversely, Pereira et al. (2013)
observed a decrease in A in rice (Oryza sativa L.) due to
stomatal and biochemical limitations, with biochemical
limitation more severe in the most sensitive cultivar. The
decrease in gs (Table 2) was probably linked to the increase in
FeAS (Table 4). According to Dufey et al. (2009), the
reduction in stomatal opening is a late response to increased
Fe uptake, rather than a defence mechanism in rice. As
expected, the decrease in gs was immediately reflected in a
lower E, which was crucial so as not to affect WUE at 125
mg dm-3 Fe.
When comparing the current results with those of Lapaz
et al. (2020), a study similar to this research, but at the
beginning of grain filling (R3; FEHR et al., 1971), it is notable
that the negative effect on gas exchange was more deleterious
than that observed at V2 (Figure 1 and Table 2), being more
pronounced under waterlogged soil combined with excess
Fe.
4.2. Reduction of photosynthetic pigment content
The photosystems (PSI and PSII) in plants are composed
of a core complex (Chl a and β-carotene) and a peripheral
antenna system (Chls a and b and carotenoids) (WIENTJES
et al., 2017). Under soil waterlogging and Fe excess, the
content of Chl a and Chl b behaved similarly to that of Tchl
(Table 3). Recent reports have shown a decrease in Chl a and
Chl b content, but with notably greater damage to Chl b, in
Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.; YAN et al., 2018),
mung bean (Vigna radiate L. Wilzeck; SAIRAM et al., 2009)
and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench; ZHANG et al.,
2019). Under Fe excess, previous studies with potato
(Solanum tuberosum L.; CHATTERJEE et al., 2006) pea (Pisum
sativum L.; XU et al., 2015) and Elodea nuttallii (Planch.) H. St.
John (XING et al., 2010) also reported higher degradation of
Chl b content.
Hence, it was assumed that both stresses degraded the
chlorophylls, leading to photooxidative and oxidative damage
to photosystems (XU et al., 2015), as verified by the increase
in amount of MDA and H2O2 content (Figure 2a and Table
4). Consequently, the reduction of photosynthetic pigments
can affect the light energy utilisation and dissipation (LAPAZ
et al., 2020). Besides that, the degradation observed in
carotenoids content (Table 3) can decrease the resistance of
chloroplasts to ROS, favouring the increase of lipid
peroxidation (LAPAZ et al., 2019), since carotenoids can act
as direct quenchers of triplet chlorophyll and singlet oxygen
with simultaneous transition to the triplet state (MASLOVA
et al., 2021).
4.3. Toxicity and Fe accumulation in shoots
Under waterlogging conditions, the potential redox of the
soil solution generally decreases favouring the reduction of
Fe3+ to Fe2+ (XU et al., 2018), which is its more soluble form
and can result in absorption of excess Fe (LAPAZ et al.,
2020). To avoid Fe toxicity, plants decrease the availability of
Fe in the soil through the build-up of Fe plaque, limit the
translocation of Fe towards the shoots, and sequester Fe in
vacuoles, plastids, and cell walls as ferritin complexes
(ARAÚJO et al., 2020). The increase in H2O2 content and
amount of MDA in soybean leaves (Figure 2a; Table 4)
showed that these strategies were not sufficient to keep Fe at
a functional level in the plant, allowing it to react with O2
(LAPAZ et al., 2022). Plants subjected to waterlogged soil at
500 mg dm-3 Fe had higher FeAS values (Table 4), even with
the decrease in SDW (Table 4). In this treatment, the highest
values of H2O2 were observed (Table 4).
Soil waterlogging and Fe excess caused changes in the
dynamics of the function of the photosynthetic apparatus
(Figure 1 and Table 2), which can induce the overproduction
of ROS causing lipid peroxidation (XING et al., 2010;
ZHENG et al., 2017; YAN et al., 2018; LAPAZ et al., 2020;
LAPAZ et al., 2022). Malondialdehyde is one of membrane
lipid peroxidation products, and its amount can reflect the
stability of the cell membrane (WANG et al., 2022).
Therefore, the responses of this work indicate that the
antioxidant system was not efficient in containing the
degradation of the membranes, except at 125 mg dm-3 Fe
under optimal water availability where there was no increase
in amount of MDA (Figure 2a). Similar results under
waterlogged soil (WANG et al., 2022) and excess Fe (XING
et al., 2010) were observed in G. max (R1 – one flower at any
node; FEHR et al., 1971) and E. nuttallii, respectively.
It is important to emphasise that the effects of
waterlogging are complex, and vary depending on genotype,
environmental conditions, growth stage and the duration of
waterlogging (TIAN et al., 2019). The limitation of biological
N fixation by soybeans (Souza et al. 2016) and the
consequence of a change from oxidative phosphorylation to
glycolysis and fermentation imposed by soil waterlogging
leads to a progressive loss of biomass and performance by
plants (GREENWAY et al., 2006; SAIRAM et al., 2009;
MARTÍNEZ-ALCÁNTARA et al., 2012), corroborating
with the results verified in SDW (Figure 2b). These
aggravations were more evident in soybean plants under
waterlogged soil associated with Fe excess. According to
Müller et al. (2017), tolerance of Fe toxicity by cultivars or
species is reflected in their biomass, which is dependent in
part by an ability to mitigate excessive Fe uptake via exclusion
mechanisms and/or by storing/remobilising absorbed Fe.
5. CONCLUSIONS
In summary, soybean plants were vulnerable to soil
waterlogging at all Fe levels tested, presenting the highest
values of MDA, H2O2, and FeAS, which resulted in
Lapaz et al.
Nativa, Sinop, v. 10, n. 3, p. 319-327, 2022.
325
accentuated damage to gas exchange and chlorophyll
content, consequently leading to lower SDW. In contrast,
soybean plants cultivated under optimal water availability
showed less damage caused by excess Fe, mainly at 125 mg
dm-3 Fe, since the traits of A, WUE, EiC, MDA, and SDW
were not affected.
6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are grateful to the São Paulo Research
Foundation (FAPESP; grant number #2018/17380-4,
#2018/01498-6, and #2020/12421-4), for the scholarship to
support the first author and for the support received to fund
this research.
7. REFERENCES
AGUILAR, J. V.; LAPAZ, A. DE M.; SANCHES, C. V.;
YOSHIDA, C. H. P.; CAMARGOS, L. S. D.;
FURLANI-JÚNIOR, E. Application of 2, 4-D hormetic
dose associated with the supply of nitrogen and nickel on
cotton plants. Journal of Environmental Science and
Health, Part B, v. 56, n. 9, p. 852-859, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2021.1966280
ALEXIEVA, V.; SERGIEV, I.; MAPELLI, S.; KARANOV,
E. The effect of drought and ultraviolet radiation on
growth and stress markers in pea and wheat. Plant, Cell
& Environment, v. 24, n. 12, p. 1337-1344, 2001.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00778.x
ARAÚJO, T. O.; ISAURE, M. P.; CHOUBASSI, G.;
BIERLA, K.; SZPUNAR, J.; TRCERA, N.; CHAY, S.;
ALCON, C.; SILVA, L. C.; CURIE, C.; MARI, S.
Paspalum urvillei and Setaria parviflora, two grasses naturally
adapted to extreme iron-rich environments. Plant
Physiology and Biochemistry, v. 151, n. 6, p. 144-156,
2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.03.014
BARBOSA, M. R.; SILVA, M. M. A.; WILLADINO, L.;
ULISSES, C.; CAMARA, T. R. Geração e desintoxicação
enzimática de espécies reativas de oxigênio em plantas.
Ciência Rural, v. 44, n. 3, p. 453-460, 2014.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782014000300011
BATAGLIA, O. C.; MASCARENHAS, H. A. A. Toxicidade
de ferro em soja. Bragantia, v. 40, n. 1, p. 199-203, 1981.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87051981000100021
BECANA, M.; MORAN, J. F.; Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I. Iron-
dependent oxygen free radical generation in plants
subjected to environmental stress: toxicity and
antioxidant protection Plant and soil, v. 201, n. 1, p. 137-
147, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004375732137
CHATTERJEE, C.; GOPAL, R.; DUBE, B. K. Impact of
iron stress on biomass, yield, metabolism and quality of
potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Scientia horticulturae, v.
108, n. 1, p. 1-6, 2006.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.01.004
DUFEY, I.; HAKIZIMANA, P.; DRAYE, X.; LUTTS, S.;
BERTIN, P. QTL mapping for biomass and
physiological parameters linked to resistance mechanisms
to ferrous iron toxicity in rice. Euphytica, v. 167, n. 2, p.
143-160, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-008-
9870-7
FEHR, W. R.; CAVINESS, C. E.; BURMOOD, D. T.;
PENNINGTON, J. S. Stage of development
descriptions for soybeans, Glycine Max (L.) Merrill1. Crop
science, v. 11, n. 6, p. 929-931, 1971.
https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1971.0011183X001100
060051x
FREI, M.; TETTEH, R. N.; RAZAFINDRAZAKA, A. L.;
FUH, M. A.; WU, L. B.; BECKER, M. Responses of rice
to chronic and acute iron toxicity: genotypic differences
and biofortification aspects. Plant and Soil, v. 408, n. 1,
p. 149-161, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-
2918-x
GREENWAY, H.; ARMSTRONG, W.; COLMER, T. D.
Conditions leading to high CO2 (> 5 kPa) in
waterlogged–flooded soils and possible effects on root
growth and metabolism. Annals of Botany, v. 98, n. 1,
p. 9-32, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl076
HEATH, R. L.; PACKER, L. Photoperoxidation in isolated
chloroplasts. Archives of biochemistry and
biophysics, v. 125, n. 1, p. 189-198, 1968.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(68)90654-1
IBAÑEZ, T. B.; SANTOS, L. F.; LAPAZ, A. M.; RIBEIRO,
I. V.; RIBEIRO, F. V.; REIS, A. R.; MOREIRA, A.;
HEINRICHS, R. Sulfur modulates yield and storage
proteins in soybean grains. Scientia Agricola, v. 78, n. 1,
p. e20190020, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-
992X-2019-0020
KOKUBUN, M. Genetic and cultural improvement of
soybean for waterlogged conditions in Asia. Field Crops
Research, v. 152, n. 14, p. 3-7, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.022
LAPAZ, A. M.; CAMARGOS, L. S.; YOSHIDA, C. H. P.;
FIRMINO, A. C.; FIGUEIREDO, P. A. M.; AGUILAR,
J. V.; NICOLAI, A. B.; PAIVA, W. S.; CRUZ, V. H.;
TOMAZ, R. S. Response of soybean to soil waterlogging
associated with iron excess in the reproductive stage.
Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, v. 26, n.
8, p. 1635-1648, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-
020-00845-8
LAPAZ, A. M.; SANTOS, L. F. M.; YOSHIDA, C. H. P.;
HEINRICHS, R.; CAMPOS, M.; REIS, A. R.
Physiological and toxic effects of selenium on seed
germination of cowpea seedlings. Bragantia, v. 78, n. 4,
p. 498-508, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-
4499.20190114
LAPAZ, A. M.; YOSHIDA, C. H. P.; GORNI, P. H.;
FREITAS-SILVA, L.; ARAÚJO, T. O.; RIBEIRO, C.
Iron toxicity: effects on the plants and detoxification
strategies. Acta bot. bras, v. 36, p. e2021abb0131, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062021abb0131
LICHTENTHALER, H. K.; WELLBURN, A. R.
Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a
and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochemical
Society Transactions, v. 11, p. 591-592, 1983.
LORETI, E.; VAN VEEN, H.; PERATA, P. Plant responses
to flooding stress Current Opinion in Plant Biology, v.
33, p. 64-71, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2016.06.005
MALAVOLTA, E.; VITTI, G. C.; OLIVEIRA, A. S.
Avaliação do estado nutricional de plantas:
princípios e aplicações. 2. ed. Piracicaba: Potafos, 1997.
319p
MARANGUIT, D.; GUILLAUME, T.; KUZYAKOV, Y.
Effects of flooding on phosphorus and iron mobilization
in highly weathered soils under different land-use types:
Short-term effects and mechanisms. Catena, v. 158, n.
14, p. 161-170, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.06.023
MARTÍNEZ-ALCÁNTARA, B.; JOVER, S.; QUIÑONES,
A.; FORNER-GINER, M. Á.; RODRÍGUEZ-GAMIR,
Soil waterlogging associated with iron excess potentiates physiological damage to soybean leaves
Nativa, Sinop, v. 10, n. 3, p. 319-327, 2022.
326
J.; LEGAZ, F.; PRIMO-MILLO, E.; IGLESIAS, D. J.
Flooding affects uptake and distribution of carbon and
nitrogen in citrus seedlings. Journal of Plant
Physiology, v. 169, n. 12, p. 1150-1157, 2012.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2012.03.016
MASLOVA, T. G.; MARKOVSKAYA, E. F.; SLEMNEV,
N. N. Functions of carotenoids in leaves of higher plants.
Biology Bulletin Reviews, v. 11, n. 5, p. 476-487, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079086421050078
MÜLLER, C.; SILVEIRA, S. F. S.; DALOSO, D. M.;
MENDES, G. C.; MERCHANT, A.; KUKI, K. N.;
OLIVA, M. A.; LOUREIRO, M. E.; ALMEIDA, A. M.
Ecophysiological responses to excess iron in lowland and
upland rice cultivars. Chemosphere, v. 189, n. 24, p. 123-
133, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.09.033
PEDO, T.; KOCH, F.; MARTINAZZO, E. G.; VILLELA,
F. A.; AUMONDE, T. Z. Physiological attributes,
growth and expression of vigor in soybean seeds under
soil waterlogging. African Journal of Agricultural
Research, v. 10, n. 39, p. 3791-3797, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2015.9661
PEREIRA, E. G.; OLIVA, M. A.; ROSADO-SOUZA, L.;
MENDES, G. C.; COLARES, D. S.; STOPATO, C. H.;
ALMEIDA, A. M. Iron excess affects rice photosynthesis
through stomatal and non-stomatal limitations. Plant
Science, v. 201-202, n. 3, p. 81-92, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.12.003
QUAGGIO, J. A.; VAN RAIJ, B.; MALAVOLTA, E.
Alternative use of the SMPbuffer solution to determine
lime requirement of soils. Communications in Soil
Science and Plant Analysis, v. 16, n. 3, p. 245-260,
1985. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103628509367600
R Development Core Team (2019) R: a Language and
Environment for Statistical Computing. R
Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna,
Austria. Disponível em: https://www.R-project.org/
RHINE, M. D.; STEVENS, G.; SHANNON, G.;
WRATHER, A.; SLEPER, D. Yield and nutritional
responses to waterlogging of soybean cultivars.
Irrigation Science, v. 28, n. 2, p. 135-142, 2010.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-009-0168-x
RODRÍGUEZ-GAMIR, J.; ANCILLO, G.; CARMEN
GONZÁLEZ-MAS, M.; PRIMO-MILLO, E.;
IGLESIAS, D. J.; FORNER-GINER, M. A. Root
signalling and modulation of stomatal closure in flooded
citrus seedlings. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, v.
49, n. 6, p. 636-645, 2011.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.03.003
SAIRAM, R. K.; DHARMAR, K.; CHINNUSAMY, V.;
MEENA, R. C. Waterlogging-induced increase in sugar
mobilization, fermentation, and related gene expression
in the roots of mung bean (Vigna radiata). Journal of
Plant Physiology, v. 166, n. 6, p. 602-616, 2009.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2008.09.005
SANTOS, H. G.; JACOMINE, P. K. T.; ANJOS, L. H. C.;
OLIVEIRA, V. A.; LUMBRERAS, J. F.; COELHO, M.
R.; ALMEIDA, J. A.; CUNHA, T. J. F.; OLIVEIRA, J.
B. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. 3.ed.
Brasília: Embrapa, 2013. 353p.
SCHULZE E. D.; BECK E.; BUCHMANN N.; CLEMENS
S.; MÜLLER-HOHENSTEIN K.; SCHERER-
LORENZEN M. In: Plant Ecology. Springer, Berlin,
Heidelberg, 2019. p. 143-164.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56233-8_5
SHIMAMURA, S.; YAMAMOTO, R.; NAKAMURA, T.;
SHIMADA, S.; KOMATSU, S. Stem hypertrophic
lenticels and secondary aerenchyma enable oxygen
transport to roots of soybean in flooded soil. Annals of
botany, v. 106, n. 2, p. 277-284, 2010.
https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq123
SINGH, S. P.; SETTER, T. L. Effect of waterlogging on
element concentrations, growth and yield of wheat
varieties under farmer’s sodic field conditions.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
India Section B: Biological Sciences, v. 87, n. 2, p.
513-520, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-015-
0607-9
SOUZA, S. C. R.; MAZZAFERA, P.; SODEK, L. Flooding
of the root system in soybean: biochemical and molecular
aspects of N metabolism in the nodule during stress and
recovery. Amino acids, v. 48, n. 5, p. 1285-1295, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-016-2179-2
THOMAS, A. L.; GUERREIRO, S. M. C.; SODEK, L.
Aerenchyma formation and recovery from hypoxia of the
flooded root system of nodulated soybean. Annals of
Botany, v. 96, n. 7, p. 1191-1198, 2005.
https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci272
TIAN, L.; LI, J.; BI, W.; ZUO, S.; LI, L.; LI, W.; SUN, L.
Effects of waterlogging stress at different growth stages
on the photosynthetic characteristics and grain yield of
spring maize (Zea mays L.) under field conditions.
Agricultural Water Management, v. 218, n. 8, p. 250-
258, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.054
VELASCO, N. F.; LIGARRETO, G. A.; DÍAZ, H. R.;
FONSECA, L. P. M. Photosynthetic responses and
tolerance to root-zone hypoxia stress of five bean
cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). South African Journal of
Botany, v. 123, n. 4, p. 200-207, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2019.02.010
VOESENEK, L. A. C. J.; COLMER, T. D.; PIERIK, R.;
MILLENAAR, F. F.; PEETERS, A. J. M. How plants
cope with complete submergence. New phytologist, v.
170, n. 2, p. 213-226, 2006.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01692.x
WANG, S., ZHOU, H., FENG, N., XIANG, H., LIU, Y.,
WANG, F., LI, W.; FENG, S.; LIU M.; ZHENG, D.
Physiological response of soybean leaves to uniconazole
under waterlogging stress at R1 stage. Journal of Plant
Physiology, v. 268, n. 1, p. 153579, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2021.153579
WIENTJES, E.; PHILIPPI, J.; BORST, J. W.; VAN
AMERONGEN, H. Imaging the Photosystem
I/Photosystem II chlorophyll ratio inside the leaf.
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-
Bioenergetics, v. 1858, n. 3, p. 259-265, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2017.01.008
XING, W.; LI, D.; LIU, G. Antioxidative responses of Elodea
nuttallii (Planch.) H. St. John to short-term iron
exposure. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, v. 48,
n. 10-11, p. 873-878, 2010.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.006
XU, S.; LIN, D.; SUN, H.; YANG, X.; ZHANG, X. Excess
iron alters the fatty acid composition of chloroplast
membrane and decreases the photosynthesis rate: a study
Lapaz et al.
Nativa, Sinop, v. 10, n. 3, p. 319-327, 2022.
327
in hydroponic pea seedlings. Acta Physiologiae
Plantarum, v. 37, n. 10, p. 1-9, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-015-1969-6
XU, Y.; SUN, X.; ZHANG, Q.; LI, X.; YAN, Z. Iron plaque
formation and heavy metal uptake in Spartina alterniflora at
different tidal concentrations and waterlogging
conditions. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety,
v. 153, n. 7, p. 91-100, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.02.008
YAN, K.; ZHAO, S.; CUI, M.; HAN, G.; WEN, P.
Vulnerability of photosynthesis and photosystem I in
Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) exposed to
waterlogging. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, v.
125, n. 4, p. 239-246, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.02.017
ZHANG, F.; ZHU, K.; WANG, Y. Q.; ZHANG, Z. P.; LU,
F.; YU, H. Q.; ZOU, J. Q. Changes in photosynthetic and
chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of sorghum
under drought and waterlogging stress.
Photosynthetica, v. 57, n. 4, p. 1156-1164, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.32615/ps.2019.136
ZHANG, Y.; CHEN, Y.; LU, H.; KONG, X.; DAI, J.; LI,
Z.; DONG, H. Growth, lint yield and changes in
physiological attributes of cotton under temporal
waterlogging. Field Crops Research, v. 194, p. 83-93,
2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.05.006
ZHENG, X. D.; ZHOU, J. Z.; TAN, D. X.; WANG, N.;
WANG, L.; SHAN, D. Q.; KONG, J. Melatonin
improves waterlogging tolerance of Malus baccata (Linn.)
Borkh. seedlings by maintaining aerobic respiration,
photosynthesis and ROS migration. Frontiers in Plant
Science, v. 8, p. 483, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00483